Reflections on authenticity in teaching and learning
How can we move from students perceiving tests as very stressful and coming down from ‘on high’ (i.e. the teacher, with a capital T) to a more motivating, human experience without losing a sense of importance and learning?
This was inspired by Marta Rosińska’s talk at IATEFL 2012 entitled ‘Tests with a human face’. It piqued my interest because many institutions incorporate testing into their assessment procedures and the idea of bringing students into the process seemed one way of authenticating it and making it a more enjoyable and formative experience for both the teachers and the learners.
In week 5, students were asked to write about their experience with peer testing.
A Selection of Student Responses
All students said they had learnt a lot and on the whole, enjoyed the experience. It is interesting to note that some students did not perceive the value in preparing the test, in that it is revision in itself (comments 2, 3 and 7). These students clearly felt that preparing the peer test was a separate activity to studying and interfered with their study time , i.e. test preparation was not deemed as ‘study’. Interestingly, it tended to be the more independent and capable students who remarked on the fact that not only did preparing tests for their peers actually helped them learn the items themselves but they also practised other skills such as listening and pronunciation that the traditional testing format does not offer.
Comments 4 and 5 illustrate the cooperative element of peer testing. Learning from and helping each other was an enjoyable part of the peer testing process. There were, of course, certain unhelpful moments where a partner forgot to bring their test and this generated food for thought on learner responsibility and its effects on others. Cooperation and responsibility are aspects of the tests that may help students develop personally and foster authentic real-life skills.
The role of the teacher as guide/consultant was apparent to me and my colleague, and one student did note that, “the role of the teacher in peer test is helping the student to prepare the test and support them.” However, the leap to learner independence was perhaps too great for some. Comments 6 and 10 suggest that these students felt the teacher should have chosen the partners (in fact this was altered later in the course and we helped to pair students) and decided what each student should be tested on. This latter point touches upon the very interesting concept of personalised tests.
Ideas to ponder:
packing up and moving to the sticks
Blogging about what's going on in my classroom and in my head.
Polemical. Questioning, debating and exploring issues in EAP
How do revolutionary teachers teach?
Exploring approaches to teaching and learning
because if you tried to count up all the things that affected learning in a classroom, you'd need a million million fingers (and you'd still probably fall way short )
Musings of a teacher always in training
...and other things I'm not so sure about
Full of tips and ideas for creating ELT and ESOL resources
Thoughts, rants and ramblings on the teaching of English as a Foreign Language
John Hughes, ELT author & teacher trainer
Because we're all still learning... I know I am.
Dogme Action Research in Costa Rica
Largest Resource for Learner Centered Teaching on the Web
On a journey to become the best English teachers we can be